The Institute for Advanced Studies in Single Panel Comics Digital Research Archive · A division of Macguffin Co.

The Institute

The Institute for Advanced Studies in Single Panel Comics exists to subject the work of Arthur Trope to a degree of scholarly attention that the work did not request and cannot prevent. Its Working Paper Series applies quantitative instruments, canon principles, and footnotes to comics that were, in every case, already funny.

Departments & Research Output

UnitOutput
Department of Applied InscrutabilityWP42, WP43, WP44, WP45, WP46, WP47, WP48, WP49, WP50, WP51
Center for Post-Canonical StudiesWP43, WP44
Laboratory for Cartoon QuantificationBMC, CIR, FIQ, NHII, QCI, RRR, RRVI, SPII-2
Office of Anachronistic ResearchWP46, WP47
Division of Comparative AnthropomorphismWP43, WP48, WP49, WP50
Research Division for Lexical Containment, Recreational Linguistics & Unfunded Research (GUFF era)WP42

The Editorial Calendar

The Working Paper Series publishes on a weekly cadence. Papers currently in preparation, in approved order of appearance. Specimens are held in the Trope Collection; comics entering the Collection are assigned a queue position at intake.

No.SpecimenProgramme noteStatus
WP52armbearsFirst multi-panel specimen; SPII-2 instrument-stress study; Sep 9 pinIn preparation
WP53goldfishSecond confirmation of the WP51 principle (the memory variant)In preparation
WP54freewifiClassification dispute (BCR? BRFT? PPO?); births the Open Questions pageIn preparation
WP55preciousmetalsBRFT second confirmation; the folk figure with a compliance problemIn preparation
WP56goodbrainfrankCalendar strand: timed to the Oct 31 pin; workplace-boundaries PPOIn preparation
WP57sushiforkFounds mortal-stakes-under-etiquette principle; Jun 18 pinIn preparation
WP58dairyaislePAO second confirmation; misclassification as lived experience; Nov 15 pinIn preparation
WP59sevenatenineNCE + PCAP double-confirmation; Pi Day anchor; the Card No. 100 clusterIn preparation
WP60extratrunkWith underseat: the archive's first comparative study (two panels, one airport)In preparation
WP61lineupSerialized continuity: the canon's first sequel (with sevenatenine); establishes the two-panel sequence as a unit of studyIn preparation
WP62oxfordcommaWith halloates: the infinite-monkeys cluster; editorial authority vs. stochastic authorshipIn preparation
WP63reservedSecond captionless specimen; CVS confirmation and its first wordless weddingIn preparation
WP64dontchewSRR: table manners recalibrated by an animal that cannot chewIn preparation
WP65ambienceDining under the predator; mortal-stakes-under-etiquette confirmation (WP57 principle)In preparation
WP66sleepclinicSecond serialized pair (with papabear): tests whether the WP61 sequence framework generalizes; SRR specimen — hibernation pathologizedIn preparation
WP67naughtylistGrievance across decades; BRFT — the naughty list as an institutional record with alumniIn preparation
WP68hottubsnowThird captionless specimen; CVS under mortal-stakes conditions (thermodynamic)In preparation
WP69spaghettiDomestic authority vs. platform income; PPO in the family kitchenIn preparation
WP70alphaintroFolk ethology (the 'alpha') meets clinical vocabulary; PAO/SRR boundary caseIn preparation
WP71dogvillePAO under stage lights: the tolerance monologue as self-incrimination; cross-species performance anxietyIn preparation
WP72beaujolaisCanon cross-reference study: the toilet-water vintage (cites WP51's reminiscence); connoisseurship recalibratedIn preparation
WP73shellshopBRFT meets commerce: the exoskeleton as real estate; upsell rhetoric in shell acquisitionIn preparation
WP74knotsAnatomical literalism: the knot examined; clinical procedure under CVS-adjacent minimalismIn preparation
WP75throwwormsNegotiation across the food chain; the fish counterparty proposes disintermediationIn preparation
WP76perkatoryPCAP's first literal afterlife specimen; the CLOSED FOR REPAIRS sign as Presentist Procedural Overlay in its purest form; drink-ticket economics of waitingIn preparation
WP77anteatersBRFT in the colony: caste as job description; the pep talk as labor theory; Labor Day sync (almanac floating rule)In preparation
WP78goodtheoryAMP inverted: the falsified theory that was right where it counted; edge-of-world cartography; Columbus Day syncIn preparation
WP79fireflySerialized-continuity study No. 2 (sequel to jarbreak, cites WP-jarbreak once deposited): Medwick family lore across three cards; NCE at maximum caption length; the nurse as cross-species careIn preparation
WP80keysinsideBCR on the lunar surface: catastrophe reassigned to a mundane cause (the keys); interrogative repetition as denialIn preparation
WP81fullofinfoInformation as pickup line: the genome at the bar; PAO across macromolecules; proposes an information-density instrumentIn preparation
WP82grubamongusPAO at the mole table: species masquerade, counterespionage among the sightless; the disguise consists entirely of sunglasses (cf. WP47 vikings on costume sufficiency)In preparation
WP83metadataGates Administration series No. 2 (after WP76 perkatory): PPO in its purest clerical form — metadata validation at intake; pairs with PCAP on afterlife onboardingIn preparation
WP84firstdraftsAMP flagship: the Bard's rejected loglines as anachronistic authorship; strikethrough as the earliest peer review; cross-cite the typewriter-monkeys department (WP-published, WP-yournotes)In preparation
WP85posterityRecording-media study: insight vs. available inscription systems; the wall as sufficiently complex; SRR-adjacent ritual of writing it down; Lascaux Day inaugural (house coin, Sep 12)In preparation
WP86leosreviewsSavanna Hospitality series No. 2 (with WP-reserved): review culture on the open plain; the ambiance deduction as PAO against the deceased; Picklefish-era masthead, period artifactIn preparation

The Digitization Backlog

Working Papers Nos. 1–41 (the Early Series) are held in the physical archive and await digitization. Petitions for access may be addressed to the Office of the Registrar; the Office reviews all petitions, and the Office's silence is also an answer. The Institute thanks its funders, who are aware of the situation.

Ethics Statement

No cartoon character was consulted regarding the interpretation assigned to them.

Findings concerning species, motives, employment status, and romantic intentions should not be construed as clinical diagnoses.

All scores are final, including the ones that were revised.